Top 5 Posts in March
Top Chef: Destination Canada
As of this writing, we're three episodes deep into the new season of Top Chef, set in Canada. It's a little bit of an odd setting, given there's already a Canadian version of Top Chef, Top Chef Canada (which is presumably why this season is titled "Destination Canada"). But judge Gail Simmons is a Toronto native, and the show has done an international/cross-spinoff season before, so it's not completely out of left field. To its credit, it's leaning into the Canadian theme in its early goings, with challenges built around poutine, maple syrup, and hockey already come and gone (seriously, outside of a Tim Horton's challenge, what other Canadian stereotypes are left?).
It's also a season where, just three episodes in, we're routinely hearing the judges rave about the quality of the food they're getting, both directly, and in terms of consistently seeing challenges play out where there's one or two obviously bad dishes and everything else earns praise. This has been a common refrain across many of the later seasons of the show, and it speaks to the ways the show has changed over the years. Once upon a time, it was a place for up-and-coming chefs to make a name for themselves. Nowadays, nearly all the contestants in every season are well-established, winners of awards and running their own kitchens or owning their own restaurants. It's less about making a name for themselves as it is building up their own brand. So of course, it makes sense that the overall quality of the food being put out, even within the unique confines and challenges of the show's format, would consistently be "the best ever".
With the Top Chef mothership turning more and more into some akin to the old Top Chef Masters spinoff (where accomplished/celebrity chefs competed), it makes me wonder if a season or two where the show specifically sets out to cast only chefs still coming into their own (Top Chef Breakouts, or something like that) wouldn't both be fun, and capture some of the show's earlier energy.
Though Tom Colicchio probably wouldn't want to willingly give up getting better food.
Review Round-Up
It's been a bit since I did one of these, so there's a ton of reviews out there I haven't shared. Rather than link to them, here's a link to my author page on Comicon.com.
A couple highlights there include Previously On X-Men, a new column in which me and a few other writers break down the week's new X-books, giving each a brief bullet point-laden rundown that is part high level review, part annotation, and part humorous observations. Check it out every Friday!
Over at ComicsXF, my X-Chat reviews of Uncanny X-Men with Adam Reck continue. I also contributed to the jam review of the frustrating and bewildering "X-Manhunt" conclusion. And I wrote up a short little review of the first issue of Oni Press' Out of Alcatraz.
ReplyDelete// I'm still not sure if having Spider-Man's origin in this iteration be the result of a bootstrap paradox makes sense for the character thematically, but I also can't deny I love a good boostrap paradox. //
Ditto. For me it helps that this is decidedly an alternate Spider-Man at the same time it’s so much more satisfying to me that it’s clearly adjacent to the mainline MCU and thus part of that larger continuity, even if we never see it explicitly referenced in a central show or film, than if it were just one of those animated series riding the coattails / being vaguely synergistic with the well-known movie universe but necessarily off-brand because of issues over casting, rights, continuity, etc. — case in point, enjoyable as they are, Peter’s friend group has a bit of that feel, or the result when you get new comics with a status quo or dynamic matching a popular TV adaptation of a comics property (like Archie did in a new Sabrina title after the Netflix show. Matter of fact, I thought at first that the Doctor Strange popping up during the origin sequence might be from the films since Peter didn’t seem to know who he was, despite him not quite being enough of a Benedict Cumberbatch soundalike. Hudson Thames strongly evoking Tom Holland really helps, and it was so fun that Charlie Cox voiced Daredevil. The great Colman Domingo has expressed a desire to play Norman Osborn in a live-action project, which has my full support.
I know “off-brand” isn’t quite the right phrase but what bother me far more is the lack of closing parenthesis. Aaaaarggh.
Delete